4.7 Article

Feedback from winds and supernovae in massive stellar clusters - I. Hydrodynamics

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt255

关键词

hydrodynamics; supernovae: general; ISM: general

资金

  1. University of Leeds
  2. Royal Society for a University Research Fellowship
  3. STFC [ST/I001557/1, ST/H008802/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H008802/1, ST/I001557/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use 3D hydrodynamical models to investigate the effects of massive star feedback from winds and supernovae on inhomogeneous molecular material left over from the formation of a massive stellar cluster. We simulate the interaction of the mechanical energy input from a cluster with three O-stars into a giant molecular cloud (GMC) clump containing 3240 M-circle dot of molecular material within a 4 pc radius. The cluster wind blows out of the molecular clump along low-density channels, into which denser clump material is entrained. We find that the densest molecular regions are surprisingly resistant to ablation by the cluster wind, in part due to shielding by other dense regions closer to the cluster. Nonetheless, molecular material is gradually removed by the cluster wind during which mass-loading factors in excess of several 100 are obtained. Because the clump is very porous, 60-75 per cent of the injected wind energy escapes the simulation domain, with the difference being radiated. After 4.4 Myr, the massive stars in our simulation begin to explode as supernovae. The highly structured environment into which the SN energy is released allows even weaker coupling to the remaining dense material and practically all of the SN energy reaches the wider environment. The molecular material is almost completely dispersed and destroyed after 6 Myr. The escape fraction of ionizing radiation is estimated to be about 50 per cent during the first 4 Myr of the cluster's life. A similar model with a larger and more massive GMC clump reveals the same general picture, though more time is needed for it to be destroyed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据