4.7 Article

Clumpy disc and bulge formation

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1563

关键词

galaxies: bulges; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: interactions

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas [PIP 2009/0305]
  2. PICT Raices [959]
  3. Programa de Cooperacion Cientifico-Tecnologica MINCyT-CONACyT [MX/09/09]
  4. Lyon Institute of Origins [ANR-10-LABX-66]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a set of hydrodynamical/N-body controlled simulations of isolated gas-rich galaxies that self-consistently include supernova (SN) feedback and a detailed chemical evolution model, both tested in cosmological simulations. The initial conditions are motivated by the observed star-forming galaxies at z similar to 2-3. We find that the presence of a multiphase interstellar media in our models promotes the growth of disc instability favouring the formation of clumps which, in general, are not easily disrupted on time-scales compared to the migration time. We show that stellar clumps migrate towards the central region and contribute to form a classical-like bulge with a Sersic index, n > 2. Our physically motivated SN feedback has a mild influence on clump survival and evolution, partially limiting the mass growth of clumps as the energy released per SN event is increased, with the consequent flattening of the bulge profile. This regulation does not prevent the building of a classical-like bulge even for the most energetic feedback tested. Our SN feedback model is able to establish self-regulated star formation, producing mass-loaded outflows and stellar age spreads comparable to observations. We find that the bulge formation by clumps may coexist with other channels of bulge assembly such as bars and mergers. Our results suggest that galactic bulges could be interpreted as composite systems with structural components and stellar populations storing archaeological information of the dynamical history of their galaxy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据