4.7 Article

Towards an accurate mass function for precision cosmology

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt301

关键词

galaxies: haloes; cosmology: theory; dark matter

资金

  1. Marie Curie Reintegration Grant
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cosmological surveys aim to use the evolution of the abundance of galaxy clusters to accurately constrain the cosmological model. In the context of Lambda cold dark matter, we show that it is possible to achieve the required per cent level accuracy in the halo mass function with gravity-only cosmological simulations, and we provide simulation start and run parameter guidelines for doing so. Some previous works have had sufficient statistical precision, but lacked robust verification of absolute accuracy. Convergence tests of the mass function with, for example, simulation start redshift can exhibit false convergence of the mass function due to counteracting errors, potentially misleading one to infer overly optimistic estimations of simulation accuracy. Per cent level accuracy is possible if initial condition particle mapping uses second-order Lagrangian perturbation theory, and if the start epoch is between 10 and 50 expansion factors before the epoch of halo formation of interest. The mass function for haloes with fewer than similar to 1000 particles is highly sensitive to simulation parameters and start redshift, implying a practical minimum mass resolution limit due to mass discreteness. The narrow range in converged start redshift suggests that it is not presently possible for a single simulation to capture accurately the cluster mass function while also starting early enough to model accurately the numbers of reionization era galaxies, whose baryon feedback processes may affect later cluster properties. Ultimately, to fully exploit current and future cosmological surveys will require accurate modelling of baryon physics and observable properties, a formidable challenge for which accurate gravity-only simulations are just an initial step.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据