4.7 Article

Super and massive AGB stars - II. Nucleosynthesis and yields - Z=0.02, 0.008 and 0.004

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1877

关键词

nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; stars: AGB and post-AGB; ISM: abundances

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0877317]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP0877317] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have computed detailed evolution and nucleosynthesis models for super and massive asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars over the mass range 6.5-9.0 M-circle dot in divisions of 0.5 M-circle dot with metallicities Z = 0.02, 0.008 and 0.004. These calculations, in which we find third dredge-up and hot bottom burning, fill the gap between existing low-and intermediate-mass AGB star models and high-mass star models that become supernovae. For the considered metallicities, the composition of the yields is largely dominated by the thermodynamic conditions at the base of the convective envelope rather than by the pollution arising from third dredge-up. We investigate the effects of various uncertainties, related to the mass-loss rate, mixing length parameter, and the treatment of evolution after the envelope instability that develops near the end of the (super) AGB phase. Varying these parameters alters the yields mainly because of their impact on the amount of third dredge-up enrichment, and to a lesser extent on the hot bottom burning conditions. Our models produce significant amounts of He-4, Li-7 (depending on the mass-loss formulation) C-13, N-14, O-17, Na-23, Mg-25, as well the radioactive isotope Al-26 in agreement with previous investigation. In addition, our results show enrichment of Ne-22, Mg-26 and Fe-60, as well as a substantial increase in our proxy neutron capture species representing all species heavier than iron. These stars may provide important contributions to the Galaxy's inventory of the heavier Mg isotopes, N-14, Li-7 and Al-27.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据