4.7 Article

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III DR9 Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts094

关键词

cosmology: observations; (cosmology:) inflation; (cosmology:) large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I001204/1]
  2. UK Science and Technology Facilities Research Council
  3. European Research Council
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. US Department of Energy Office of Science
  8. University of Arizona
  9. Brazilian Participation Group
  10. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  11. Cambridge University
  12. Carnegie Mellon University
  13. Case Western University
  14. University of Florida
  15. Fermilab
  16. French Participation Group
  17. German Participation Group
  18. Harvard University
  19. UC Irvine
  20. Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia
  21. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  22. Institucio Catalana de Recerca y Estudis Avancat, Barcelona
  23. Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular
  24. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  25. Johns Hopkins University
  26. Korean Institute for Advanced Study
  27. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  28. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  29. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  30. New Mexico State University
  31. New York University
  32. Ohio State University
  33. Pennsylvania State University
  34. University of Pittburgh
  35. University of Portsmouth
  36. Princeton University
  37. UC Santa Cruz
  38. Spanish Participation Group
  39. Texas Christian University
  40. Trieste Astrophysical Observatory
  41. University of Tokyo/IPMU
  42. University of Utah
  43. Vanderbilt University
  44. University of Virginia
  45. University of Washington
  46. University of Wisconson
  47. Yale University
  48. STFC [ST/H008586/1, ST/I001204/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/J005673/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  49. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J005673/1, ST/H008586/1, ST/I001204/1, ST/K00333X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  50. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0901965] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyse the density field of 264 283 galaxies observed by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) and included in the SDSS Data Release 9 (DR9). In total, the SDSS DR9 BOSS data include spectroscopic redshifts for over 400 000 galaxies spread over a footprint of more than 3000 deg(2). We measure the power spectrum of these galaxies with redshifts 0.43 < z < 0.7 in order to constrain the amount of local non-Gaussianity, f(NL)(local), in the primordial density field, paying particular attention to the impact of systematic uncertainties. The BOSS galaxy density field is systematically affected by the local stellar density and this influences the ability to accurately measure f(NL)(local). In the absence of any correction, we find (erroneously) that the probability that f(NL)(local) is greater than zero, P(f(NL)(local) > 0), is 99.5 per cent. After quantifying and correcting for the systematic bias and including the added uncertainty, we find -45 < f(NL)(local) < 195 at 95 per cent confidence and P(f(NL)(local) > 0) = 91.0 per cent. A more conservative approach assumes that we have only learnt the k dependence of the systematic bias and allows any amplitude for the systematic correction; we find that the systematic effect is not fully degenerate with that of f(NL)(local), and we determine that - 82 < f(NL)(local) < 178 (at 95 per cent confidence) and P(f(NL)(local) > 0) = 68 per cent. This analysis demonstrates the importance of accounting for the impact of Galactic foregrounds on f(NL)(local) measurements. We outline the methods that account for these systematic biases and uncertainties. We expect our methods to yield robust constraints on f(NL)(local) for both our own and future large-scale structure investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据