4.7 Review

Galaxy properties from the ultraviolet to the far-infrared: Λ cold dark matter models confront observations

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20490.x

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; cosmology: theory

资金

  1. Fermi Guest Investigator grant
  2. SISSA Astrophysics Sector
  3. NASA ATP [AST-1010033]
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1010033] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We combine a semi-analytic model of galaxy formation with simple analytic recipes describing the absorption and re-emission of starlight by dust in the interstellar medium of galaxies. We use the resulting models to predict galaxy counts and luminosity functions from the far-ultraviolet (FUV) to the submillimetre, from redshift five to the present, and compare with an extensive compilation of observations. We find that in order to reproduce the rest-UV and optical luminosity functions at high redshift, we must assume an evolving normalization in the dust-to-metal ratio, implying that galaxies of a given bolometric luminosity (or metal column density) must be less extinguished than their local counterparts. In our best-fitting model, we find remarkably good agreement with observations from rest similar to 1500 angstrom to m. At longer wavelengths, most dramatically in the submillimetre, our models underpredict the number of bright galaxies by a large factor. The models reproduce the observed total IR luminosity function fairly well. We show the results of varying several ingredients of the models, including various aspects of the dust attenuation recipe, the dust emission templates and the cosmology. We use our models to predict the integrated extragalactic background light, and compare with an observationally motivated extragalactic background light EBL model and with other available observational constraints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据