4.7 Article

A broad iron line in LMC X-1

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22128.x

关键词

accretion; accretion discs; black hole physics; stars: individual: LMC X-1; X-rays: binaries

资金

  1. Smithsonian Institution Endowment Funds
  2. NASA [PF1-120087, NNX11AD08G, NNX09AV59G]
  3. STFC [ST/J001538/1, ST/J000647/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. NASA [NNX09AV59G, 105653] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001538/1, ST/H00243X/1, ST/J000647/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present results from a deep Suzaku observation of the black hole in LMC X-1, supplemented by coincident monitoring with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE). We identify broad relativistic reflection features in a soft disc-dominated spectrum. A strong and variable power-law component of emission is present which we use to demonstrate that enhanced Comptonization strengthens disc reflection. We constrain the spin parameter of the black hole by modelling LMC X-1's broad reflection features. For our primary and most comprehensive spectral model, we obtain a high value for the spin: a*=0.97-0.13+0.01 (68 per cent confidence). However, by additionally considering two alternate models as a measure of our systematic uncertainty, we obtain a broader constraint: a*=0.97-0.25+0.02. Both of these spin values are entirely consistent with a previous estimate of spin obtained using the continuum-fitting method. At 99 per cent confidence, the reflection features require a* > 0.2. In addition to modelling the relativistically broadened reflection, we also model a sharp and prominent reflection component that provides strong evidence for substantial reprocessing in the wind of the massive companion. We infer that this wind sustains the ionization cone surrounding the binary system; this hypothesis naturally produces appropriate and consistent mass, time and length scales for the cone structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据