4.7 Article

Origin of strong magnetic fields in Milky Way-like galactic haloes

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20759.x

关键词

methods: analytical; methods: numerical; galaxies: formation; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: magnetic fields; early Universe

资金

  1. DFG Research Unit 1254
  2. DFG [1177]
  3. DFG Cluster of Excellence 'Origin and Structure of the Universe'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An analytical model predicting the growth rates, the absolute growth times and the saturation values of the magnetic field strength within galactic haloes is presented. The analytical results are compared to cosmological magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations of Milky Way-like galactic halo formation performed with the N-body/spmhd code gadget. The halo has a mass of approximate to 3 x 1012 M-circle dot and a virial radius of approximate to 270 kpc. The simulations in a ? cold dark matter (?CDM) cosmology also include radiative cooling, star formation, supernova feedback and the description of non-ideal MHD. A primordial magnetic seed field ranging from 10-10 to 10-34 G in strength agglomerates together with the gas within filaments and protohaloes. There, it is amplified within a couple of hundred million years up to equipartition with the corresponding turbulent energy. The magnetic field strength increases by turbulent small-scale dynamo action. The turbulence is generated by the gravitational collapse and by supernova feedback. Subsequently, a series of halo mergers leads to shock waves and amplification processes magnetizing the surrounding gas within a few billion years. At first, the magnetic energy grows on small scales and then self-organizes to larger scales. Magnetic field strengths of approximate to 10-6 G are reached in the centre of the halo and drop to approximate to 10-9 G in the intergalactic medium. Analysing the saturation levels and growth rates, the model is able to describe the process of magnetic amplification notably well and confirms the results of the simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据