4.7 Article

X-ray emission from high-redshift miniquasars: self-regulating the population of massive black holes through global warming

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21539.x

关键词

black hole physics; gravitational waves; galaxies: formation; quasars: general; cosmology: theory

资金

  1. NSF [AST-1009396]
  2. NASA [NNX11AE05G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observations of high-redshift quasars at z greater than or similar to 6 imply that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) with masses M greater than or similar to 10(9) M-circle dot were in place less than 1 Gyr after the big bang. If these SMBHs assembled from 'seed' BHs left behind by the first stars, then they must have accreted gas at close to the Eddington limit during a large fraction (greater than or similar to 50 per cent) of the time. A generic problem with this scenario, however, is that the mass density in M similar to 10(6) M-circle dot SMBHs at z similar to 6 already exceeds the locally observed SMBH mass density by several orders of magnitude; in order to avoid this overproduction, BH seed formation and growth must become significantly less efficient in less massive protogalaxies through some form of feedback, while proceeding unabated in the most massive galaxies that formed first. Using Monte Carlo realizations of the merger and growth history of BHs, we show that X-rays from the earliest accreting BHs can provide such a feedback mechanism, on a global scale. Our calculations paint a self-consistent picture of BH-made climate change, in which the first miniquasars - among them the ancestors of the z similar to 6 quasar SMBHs - globally warm the intergalactic medium and suppress the formation and growth of subsequent generations of BHs. We present two specific models with global miniquasar feedback that provide excellent agreement with recent estimates of the z = 6 SMBH mass function. For each of these models, we estimate the rate of BH mergers at z > 6 that could be detected by the proposed gravitational-wave observatory eLISA/NGO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据