4.7 Article

X-ray colour-colour selection for heavily absorbed active galactic nuclei

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20689.x

关键词

galaxies: active; galaxies: Seyfert; X-rays: galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a method for the identification of heavily absorbed active galactic nuclei (AGN) (N-H > 10(23) cm(-2)) from X-ray photometric data. We do this using a set of XMM-Newton reference spectra of local galaxies for which we have accurate N-H information, as described in Brightman & Nandra. The technique uses two rest-frame hardness ratios which are optimized for this task, which we designate HR1 (2-4/1-2 keV) and HR2 (4-16/2-4 keV). The selection method exploits the fact that while obscured AGN appear hard in HR2 due to absorption of the intrinsic source flux below similar to 4 keV, they appear soft in HR1 due to excess emission originating from scattered source light, thermal emission or host galaxy emission. Such emission is ubiquitous in low-redshift samples. The technique offers a very simple and straightforward way of estimating the fraction of obscured AGN in samples with relatively low signal-to-noise ratio in the X-ray band. We apply this technique to a moderate redshift (z similar to 1) sample of AGN from the Chandra Deep Field-North, finding that 61 per cent of this sample has N-H > 10(23) cm(-2). A clear and robust conclusion from our analysis is that in deep surveys the vast majority of sources do not show hardness ratios consistent with a simple absorbed power law. The ubiquity of complex spectra in turn shows that simple hardness ratio analysis will not yield reliable obscuration estimates, justifying the more complex colour-colour analysis described in this paper. While this method does very well at separating sources with N-H > 10(23) cm(-2) from sources with lower NH, only X-ray spectroscopy can identify Compton-thick sources, through the detection of the Fe K alpha line. This will be made possible with the high throughput X-ray spectral capabilities of Athena.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据