4.7 Article

Radiative transfer effects during primordial helium recombination

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21110.x

关键词

radiative transfer; cosmology: theory; cosmology: observations

资金

  1. NSF Physics Frontier Center [PHY-0114422]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we refine the calculation of primordial helium recombination, accounting for several additional effects that were neglected or treated more approximately in previous studies. These include consideration of the following: (i) time-dependent radiative transfer interaction between the 21P111S0 and 23P111S0 resonances; (ii) time-dependent radiative transfer for the partially overlapping n1P111S0, n1D211S0 and n3P111S0 series with 3 =n= 10; (iii) electron scattering within a kernel approach. We also briefly discuss the effect of electron scattering and H i quadrupole lines on the recombination of hydrogen. Although the physics of all considered processes is interesting and subtle, for the standard cosmology, with helium abundance Yp? 0.24, the overall correction to the ionization history during helium recombination with respect to the previous implementation of CosmoRec remains smaller than |?Ne/Ne| ? 0.05 per cent. The dominant improvement is caused by consistent inclusion of resonance scattering for the 21P111S0 resonance. For cosmologies with a large helium fraction, Yp? 0.4, the difference reaches |?Ne/Ne| ? 0.22 per cent at z? 1800; however, the overall correction to the cosmic microwave background power spectra is small, exceeding |?Cl/Cl| ? 0.05 per cent only at l? 3000. In comparison to the current version of Recfast the difference reaches |?Cl/Cl| ? 0.4 per cent at l? 3000 for Yp? 0.4, and also for the standard value Yp? 0.24 we find differences of |?Cl/Cl| ? 0.1 per cent at l? 2500. The new processes are now included by the cosmological recombination code CosmoRec and can be activated as needed for most settings without affecting its runtime significantly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据