4.7 Article

From weak lensing to non-Gaussianity via Minkowski functionals

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19718.x

关键词

gravitational lensing: weak; methods: analytical; methods: numerical; methods: statistical; cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. STFC [ST/G002231/1]
  2. NSERC
  3. CIfAR
  4. NSF [AST-0645427]
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G002231/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new harmonic-domain-based approach for extracting morphological information, in the form of Minkowski functionals (MFs), from weak-lensing convergence maps. Using a perturbative expansion of the MFs, which is expected to be valid for the range of angular scales probed by most current weak-lensing surveys, we show that the study of three generalized skewness parameters is equivalent to the study of the three MFs defined in 2D. We then extend these skewness parameters to three associated skew spectra which carry more information about the convergence bispectrum than their one-point counterparts. We discuss various issues such as noise and incomplete sky coverage in the context of estimation of these skew spectra from realistic data. Our technique provides an alternative to the pixel-space approaches typically used in the estimation of MFs, and it can be particularly useful in the presence of masks with non-trivial topology. Analytical modelling of weak-lensing statistics relies on an accurate modelling of the statistics of the underlying density distribution. We apply three different formalisms to model the underlying dark matter bispectrum: the hierarchical ansatz, halo model and a fitting function based on numerical simulations; MFs resulting from each of these formalisms are computed and compared. We investigate the extent to which late-time gravity-induced non-Gaussianity (to which weak lensing is primarily sensitive) can be separated from primordial non-Gaussianity and how this separation depends on source redshift and angular scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据