4.7 Article

Herschel-ATLAS: first data release of the Science Demonstration Phase source catalogues

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18864.x

关键词

methods: data analysis; catalogues; surveys; galaxies: general; submillimetre: galaxies

资金

  1. NASA
  2. ASI/INAF [I/009/10/0]
  3. STFC [ST/G002533/1, ST/G002630/1, ST/I005765/1, ST/I001212/1, PP/D000963/1, ST/H001530/1, ST/G002622/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G002630/1, ST/I005765/1, ST/G002622/1, PP/D000963/1, ST/I001212/1, ST/G002533/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. UK Space Agency [ST/G003874/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Herschel Astrophysical Terahertz LargeArea Survey (Herschel-ATLAS) is a survey of 550 deg(2) with the Herschel Space Observatory in five far-infrared and submillimetre bands. The first data for the survey, observations of a field 4 x 4 deg(2) in size, were taken during the Science Demonstration Phase (SDP), and reach a 5s noise level of 33.5 mJy beam(-1) at 250 mu m. This paper describes the source extraction methods used to create the corresponding SDP catalogue, which contains 6876 sources, selected at 250 mu m, within similar to 14 deg(2). Spectral and Photometric Imaging REciever (SPIRE) sources are extracted using a new method specifically developed for Herschel data and Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) counterparts of these sources are identified using circular apertures placed at the SPIRE positions. Aperture flux densities are measured for sources identified as extended after matching to optical wavelengths. The reliability of this catalogue is also discussed, using full simulated maps at the three SPIRE bands. These show that a significant number of sources at 350 and 500 mu m have undergone flux density enhancements of up to a factor of similar to 2, due mainly to source confusion. Correction factors are determined for these effects. The SDP data set and corresponding catalogue will be available from www.h-atlas.org.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据