4.7 Review

The coevolution of the velocity and mass functions of galaxies and dark haloes

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18181.x

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: statistics; galaxies: structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We employ a bias-corrected abundance-matching technique to investigate the coevolution of the Lambda cold dark matter (Lambda CDM) dark halo mass function (HMF), the observationally derived velocity dispersion and stellar mass functions (VDF, SMF) of galaxies between z = 1 and 0. We use for the first time the evolution of the VDF constrained through strong lensing statistics by Chae for galaxy-halo abundance-matching studies. As a local benchmark we use a couple of z similar to 0 VDFs [a Monte Carlo realized VDF based on Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 5 (DR5) and a directly measured VDF based on SDSS DR6]. We then focus on connecting the VDF evolution to the HMF evolution predicted by N-body simulations and the SMF evolution constrained by galaxy surveys. On the VDF-HMF connection, we find that the local dark halo virial mass-central stellar velocity dispersion (M-vir-Sigma) relation is in good agreement with the individual properties of well-studied low-redshift dark haloes, and the VDF evolution closely parallels the HMF evolution meaning little evolution in the M-vir-Sigma relation. On the VDF-SMF connection, it is also likely that the stellar mass-stellar velocity dispersion (M-star-Sigma) relation evolves little, taking the abundance-matching results together with other independent observational results and hydrodynamic simulation results. Our results support the simple picture that as the halo grows hierarchically, the stellar mass and the central stellar velocity dispersion grow in parallel. We discuss possible implications of this parallel coevolution for galaxy formation and evolution under the Lambda CDM paradigm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据