4.7 Article

The influence of the turbulent perturbation scale on pre-stellar core fragmentation and disc formation

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19741.x

关键词

hydrodynamics; turbulence; circumstellar matter; stars: formation; stars: low-mass

资金

  1. Marie Curie RTN 'CONSTELLATION' [MRTN-CT-2006-035890]
  2. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/HH001530/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The collapse of weakly turbulent pre-stellar cores is a critical stage in the process of star formation. Being highly non-linear and stochastic, the outcome of collapse can only be explored theoretically by performing large ensembles of numerical simulations. Standard practice is to quantify the initial turbulent velocity field in a core in terms of the amount of turbulent energy (or some equivalent) and the exponent in the power spectrum (n =-dlog Pk/dlog k). In this paper, we present a numerical study of the influence of the details of the turbulent velocity field on the collapse of an isolated, weakly turbulent, low-mass pre-stellar core. We show that, as long as n ? 3 (as is usually assumed), a more critical parameter than n is the maximum wavelength in the turbulent velocity field, ?MAX. This is because ?MAX carries most of the turbulent energy, and thereby influences both the amount and the spatial coherence of the angular momentum in the core. We show that the formation of dense filaments during collapse depends critically on ?MAX, and we explain this finding using a force balance analysis. We also show that the core has only a high probability of fragmenting if ?MAX > RCORE/2 (where RCORE is the core radius), the dominant mode of fragmentation involves the formation and break-up of filaments and although small protostellar discs (with radius RDISC? 20 au) form routinely, more extended discs are rare. In turbulent, low-mass cores of the type we simulate here, the formation of large, fragmenting protostellar discs is suppressed by early fragmentation in the filaments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据