4.7 Article

Optimizing weak lensing mass estimates for cluster profile uncertainty

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19135.x

关键词

gravitational lensing: weak; galaxies: clusters: general; cosmology: observations; dark matter

资金

  1. Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes
  2. DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst)
  3. NSF [AST-090827]
  4. DOE [DE-FG02-95ER40893]
  5. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan
  6. JSPS
  7. DFG Cluster of Excellence
  8. [TR33]
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22740149] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Weak lensing measurements of cluster masses are necessary for calibrating mass-observable relations (MORs) to investigate the growth of structure and the properties of dark energy. However, the measured cluster shear signal varies at fixed mass M-200m due to inherent ellipticity of background galaxies, intervening structures along the line of sight and variations in the cluster structure due to scatter in concentrations, asphericity and substructure. We use N-body simulated haloes to derive and evaluate a weak lensing circular aperture mass measurement M-ap that minimizes the mass estimate variance <(M-ap - M-200m)(2)> in the presence of all these forms of variability. Depending on halo mass and observational conditions, the resulting mass estimator improves on M-ap filters optimized for circular NFW-profile clusters in the presence of uncorrelated large-scale structure (LSS) about as much as the latter improve on an estimator that only minimizes the influence of shape noise. Optimizing for uncorrelated LSS while ignoring the variation of internal cluster structure puts too much weight on the profile near the cores of haloes, and under some circumstances can even be worse than not accounting for LSS at all. We briefly discuss the impact of variability in cluster structure and correlated structures on the design and performance of weak lensing surveys intended to calibrate cluster MORs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据