4.7 Article

Non-universality of halo profiles and implications for dark matter experiments

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18930.x

关键词

galaxies: haloes; cosmology: theory; dark matter

资金

  1. DOE
  2. Chinese academy of science (CAS)
  3. National basic research programme of China (programme 973) [2009CB24901]
  4. NSFC [10973018]
  5. STFC
  6. hospitality of the Institute for Computational Cosmology in Durham, UK
  7. STFC [ST/F010176/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F010176/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the cosmological halo-to-halo scatter of the distribution of mass within dark matter haloes utilizing a well-resolved statistical sample of clusters from the cosmological Millennium Simulation. We find that at any radius, the spherically averaged dark matter density of a halo (corresponding to the 'smooth component') and its logarithmic slope are well described by a Gaussian probability distribution. At small radii (within the scale radius), the density distribution is fully determined by the measured Gaussian distribution in halo concentrations. The variance in the radial distribution of mass in dark matter haloes is important for the interpretation of direct and indirect dark matter detection efforts. The scatter in mass profiles imparts approximately a 25 per cent cosmological uncertainty in the dark matter density at the Solar neighbourhood and a factor of similar to 3 uncertainty in the expected Galactic dark matter annihilation flux. The aggregate effect of halo-to-halo profile scatter leads to a small (few per cent) enhancement in dark matter annihilation background if the Gaussian concentration distribution holds for all halo masses versus a 10 per cent enhancement under the assumption of a lognormal concentration distribution. The Gaussian nature of the cluster profile scatter implies that the technique of 'stacking' haloes to improve signal-to-noise ratio should not suffer from bias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据