4.7 Article

Multifrequency, thermally coupled radiative transfer with traphic: method and tests

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18032.x

关键词

hydrodynamics; radiative transfer; methods: numerical; H II regions; diffuse radiation; large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. National Computing Facilities Foundation (NCF)
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  3. NSF [AST-0708795, AST-1009928]
  4. NASA [NNX08AL43G, NNX09AJ33G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an extension of traphic, the method for radiative transfer of ionizing radiation in smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations that we introduced in Pawlik & Schaye. The new version keeps all advantages of the original implementation: photons are transported at the speed of light, in a photon-conserving manner, directly on the spatially adaptive, unstructured grid traced out by the particles, in a computation time that is independent of the number of radiation sources, and in parallel on distributed memory machines. We extend the method to include multiple frequencies, both hydrogen and helium, and to model the coupled evolution of the temperature and ionization balance. We test our methods by performing a set of simulations of increasing complexity and including a small cosmological reionization run. The results are in excellent agreement with exact solutions, where available, and also with results obtained with other codes if we make similar assumptions and account for differences in the atomic rates used. We use the new implementation to illustrate the differences between simulations that compute photoheating in the grey approximation and those that use multiple frequency bins. We show that close to ionizing sources the grey approximation asymptotes to the multifrequency result if photoheating rates are computed in the optically thin limit, but that the grey approximation breaks down everywhere if, as is often done, the optically thick limit is assumed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据