4.7 Article

Radiation hydrodynamics of triggered star formation: the effect of the diffuse radiation field

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20062.x

关键词

hydrodynamics; radiative transfer; methods: numerical; stars: formation; H II regions; ISM: kinematics and dynamics

资金

  1. STFC
  2. BIS
  3. University of Exeter
  4. STFC [ST/F003277/1, ST/J001627/1, ST/H008535/1, ST/I505672/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001627/1, ST/F003277/1, ST/I505672/1, ST/H008535/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the effect of including diffuse field radiation when modelling the radiatively driven implosion of a Bonnor-Ebert sphere (BES). Radiation-hydrodynamical calculations are performed by using operator splitting to combine Monte Carlo photoionization with grid-based Eulerian hydrodynamics that includes self-gravity. It is found that the diffuse field has a significant effect on the nature of radiatively driven collapse which is strongly coupled to the strength of the driving shock that is established before impacting the BES. This can result in either slower or more rapid star formation than expected using the on-the-spot approximation depending on the distance of the BES from the source object. As well as directly compressing the BES, stronger shocks increase the thickness and density in the shell of accumulated material, which leads to short, strong, photoevaporative ejections that reinforce the compression whenever it slows. This happens particularly effectively when the diffuse field is included as rocket motion is induced over a larger area of the shell surface. The formation and evolution of 'elephant trunks' via instability is also found to vary significantly when the diffuse field is included. Since the perturbations that seed instabilities are smeared out elephant trunks form less readily and, once formed, are exposed to enhanced thermal compression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据