4.7 Article

Measuring the galaxy-mass and galaxy-dust correlations through magnification and reddening

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16486.x

关键词

gravitational lensing: weak; dust; extinction; dark matter

资金

  1. Monell Foundation
  2. Friends of the Institute for Advanced Study
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. US Department of Energy
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  8. Max Planck Society
  9. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20540255] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a simultaneous detection of gravitational magnification and dust reddening effects due to galactic haloes and large-scale structure. The measurement is based on correlating the brightness of similar to 85 000 quasars at z > 1 with the position of 24 million galaxies at z similar to 0.3 derived from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and is used to constrain the galaxy-mass and galaxy-dust correlation functions up to cosmological scales. The presence of dust is detected from 20 kpc to several Mpc, and we find its projected density to follow: Sigma(dust) similar to r-0.8(p), a distribution similar to mass. On large scales, its wavelength dependence is described by R(V) similar or equal to 4.9 +/- 3.2, consistent with interstellar dust. This, in turn, implies a cosmic dust density of (dust) similar or equal to 5 x 10-6, roughly half of which comes from dust in haloes of similar to L star galaxies. We estimate the resulting opacity of the Universe for various evolutionary models and find << A(V) >> similar to 0.03 mag up to z = 0.5. We present magnification measurements, corrected for dust extinction, from which the galaxy-mass correlation function is inferred to give the mean surface mass density profile around galaxies Sigma similar to 30(theta /1 arcmin)-0.8 h M(circle dot) pc-2 up to a radius of 10 Mpc, in agreement with gravitational shear estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据