4.7 Article

Multiscale phenomenology of the cosmic web

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17263.x

关键词

methods: data analysis; methods: numerical; cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyse the structure and connectivity of the distinct morphologies that define the cosmic web. With the help of our multiscale morphology filter (MMF), we dissect the matter distribution of a cosmological Lambda cold dark matter N-body computer simulation into cluster, filaments and walls. The MMF is ideally suited to address both the anisotropic morphological character of filaments and sheets, and the multiscale nature of the hierarchically evolved cosmic matter distribution. The results of our study may be summarized as follows. (i) While all morphologies occupy a roughly well-defined range in density, this alone is not sufficient to differentiate between them given their overlap. Environment defined only in terms of density fails to incorporate the intrinsic dynamics of each morphology. This plays an important role in both linear and non-linear interactions between haloes. (ii) Most of the mass in the Universe is concentrated in filaments, narrowly followed by clusters. In terms of volume, clusters only represent a minute fraction and filaments not more than 9 per cent. Walls are relatively inconspicuous in terms of mass and volume. (iii) On average, massive clusters are connected to more filaments than low-mass clusters. Clusters with M similar to 10(14) M(circle dot)h(-1) have on average two connecting filaments, while clusters with M >= 10(15) M(circle dot)h(-1) have on average five connecting filaments. (iv) Density profiles indicate that the typical width of filaments is 2 h(-1) Mpc. Walls have less well-defined boundaries with widths between 5 and 8 Mpc h(-1). In their interior, filaments have a power-law density profile with slope gamma approximate to -1, corresponding to an isothermal density profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据