4.7 Article

The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the selection function and z=0.6 galaxy power spectrum

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16747.x

关键词

surveys; cosmological parameters; large-scale structure of Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report one of the most accurate measurements of the three-dimensional large-scale galaxy power spectrum achieved to date, using 56 159 redshifts of bright emission-line galaxies at effective redshift z approximate to 0.6 from the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey at the Anglo-Australian Telescope. We describe in detail how we construct the survey selection function allowing for the varying target completeness and redshift completeness. We measure the total power with an accuracy of approximately 5 per cent in wavenumber bands of Delta k = 0.01 h Mpc(-1). A model power spectrum including non-linear corrections, combined with a linear galaxy bias factor and a simple model for redshift-space distortions, provides a good tit to our data for scales k < 0.4 h Mpc(-1). The large-scale shape of the power spectrum is consistent with the best-fitting matter and baryon densities determined by observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation. By splitting the power spectrum measurement as a function of tangential and radial wavenumbers, we delineate the characteristic imprint of peculiar velocities. We use these to determine the growth rate of structure as a function of redshift in the ranee 0.4 < Z < 0.8, including a data point at z = 0.78 with an accuracy of 20 per cent. Our growth rate measurements are a close match to the self-consistent prediction of the A cold dark matter model. The WiggleZ survey data will allow a wide range of investigations into the cosmological model, cosmic expansion and growth history, topology of cosmic structure and Gaussianity of the initial conditions. Our calculation of the survey selection function will be released at a future date via our website wigglez.swin.edu.au.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据