4.7 Review

Substructure lensing: effects of galaxies, globular clusters and satellite streams

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17235.x

关键词

gravitational lensing: strong; galaxies: structure; dark matter

资金

  1. Dorothy Hodgkin fellowship
  2. STFC
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. National Basic Research Programme of China (973 program) [2009CB24901]
  5. Royal Society
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F002300/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/F010176/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [ST/F002289/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/F010176/1, ST/F002300/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lensing flux-ratio anomalies have been frequently observed and taken as evidence for the presence of abundant dark matter substructures in lensing galaxies, as predicted by the cold dark matter (CDM) model of cosmogony. In previous work, we examined the cusp-caustic relations of the multiple images of background quasars lensed by galaxy-scale dark matter haloes, using a suite of high-resolution N-body simulations (the Aquarius simulations). In this work, we extend our previous calculations to incorporate both the baryonic and diffuse dark components in lensing haloes. We include in each lensing simulation: (1) a satellite galaxy population derived from a semi-analytic model applied to the Aquarius haloes; (2) an empirical Milky Way globular cluster population and (3) satellite streams (diffuse dark component) identified in the simulations. Accounting for these extra components, we confirm our earlier conclusion that the abundance of intrinsic substructures (dark or bright, bound or diffuse) is not sufficient to explain the observed frequency of cusp-caustic violations in the Cosmic Lens All-Sky Survey (CLASS). We conclude that the observed effect could be the result of the small number statistics of CLASS, or intergalactic haloes along the line of sight acting as additional sources of lensing flux anomalies. Another possibility is that this discrepancy signals a failure of the CDM model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据