4.7 Article

The impact of AGN feedback and baryonic cooling on galaxy clusters as gravitational lenses

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16674.x

关键词

gravitational lensing: strong; gravitational lensing: weak; galaxies: clusters: general; cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. STFC
  3. Kavli foundation
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H008586/1, ST/F00723X/1, PP/E004040/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. STFC [PP/E004040/1, ST/F00723X/1, ST/H008586/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the impact of active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback on the gravitational lensing properties of a sample of galaxy clusters with masses in the range 1014-1015 M-circle dot, using state-of-the-art simulations. Adopting a ray-tracing algorithm, we compute the cross-section of giant arcs from clusters simulated with dark matter (DM) only physics, DM plus gas with cooling and star formation (CSF) and DM plus gas with cooling, star formation and AGN feedback (CSFBH). Once AGN feedback is included, baryonic physics boosts the strong-lensing cross-section by much less than previously estimated using clusters simulated with only CSF. For a cluster with a virial mass of 7.4 x 1014 M-circle dot, inclusion of baryonic physics without feedback can boost the cross-section by as much as a factor of 3, in agreement with previous studies, whereas once AGN feedback is included this maximal figure falls to a factor of 2 at most. Typically, clusters simulated with DM and CSFBH physics have similar cross-sections for the production of giant arcs. We also investigate how baryonic physics affects the weak-lensing properties of the simulated clusters by fitting NFW profiles to synthetic weak-lensing data sets using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach, and by performing non-parametric mass reconstructions. Without the inclusion of AGN feedback, measured concentration parameters can be much larger than those obtained with AGN feedback, which are similar to the DM-only case.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据