4.7 Article

Deep Gemini/GMOS imaging of an extremely isolated globular cluster in the Local Group

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15678.x

关键词

globular clusters: general; galaxies: individual: M31

资金

  1. European Commission [MCEXT-CT-2005-025869]
  2. STFC
  3. [GN-2007B-Q-58]
  4. STFC [ST/H004165/1, PP/E00105X/1, ST/G001979/1, PP/C002229/1, ST/H001972/1, ST/H004157/1, ST/H001913/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H004165/1, PP/E00105X/1, ST/G001979/1, PP/C002229/1, ST/H00243X/1, ST/H001913/1, ST/H004157/1, ST/H001972/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on deep imaging of a remote M31 globular cluster, MGC1, obtained with Gemini/GMOS. Our colour-magnitude diagram for this object extends similar to 5 mag below the tip of the red-giant branch and exhibits features consistent with an ancient metal-poor stellar population, including a long, well-populated horizontal branch. The red-giant branch locus suggests MGC1 has a metal abundance [M/H] approximate to -2.3. We measure the distance to MGC1 and find that it lies similar to 160 kpc in front of M31 with a distance modulus mu = 23.95 +/- 0.06. Combined with its large projected separation of R(p) = 117 kpc from M31, this implies a deprojected radius of R(gc) = 200 +/- 20 kpc, rendering it the most isolated known globular cluster in the Local Group by some considerable margin. We construct a radial brightness profile for MGC1 and show that it is both centrally compact and rather luminous, with M(V) = -9.2. Remarkably, the cluster profile shows no evidence for a tidal limit and we are able to trace it to a radius of at least 450 pc, and possibly as far as similar to 900 pc. The profile exhibits a power-law fall-off with exponent gamma = -2.5, breaking to gamma = -3.5 in its outermost parts. This core-halo structure is broadly consistent with expectations derived from numerical models, and suggests that MGC1 has spent many gigayears in isolation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据