4.7 Article

Magnetic field, chemical composition and line profile variability of the peculiar eclipsing binary star AR Aur

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17057.x

关键词

stars: abundances; binaries: eclipsing; stars: chemically peculiar; stars: individual: AR Aur; stars: magnetic field

资金

  1. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC Canada)
  4. Department of National Defence (Canada)
  5. STFC [PP/E002242/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E002242/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AR Aur is the only eclipsing binary known to contain a HgMn star, making it an ideal case for a detailed study of the HgMn phenomenon. HgMn stars are a poorly understood class of chemically peculiar stars, which have traditionally been thought not to possess significant magnetic fields. However, the recent discovery of line profile variability in some HgMn stars, apparently attributable to surface abundance patches, has brought this belief into question. In this paper we investigate the chemical abundances, line profile variability, and magnetic field of the primary and secondary of the AR Aur system, using a series of high-resolution spectropolarimetric observations. We find the primary is indeed a HgMn star, and present the most precise abundances yet determined for this star. We find the secondary is a weak Am star, and is possibly still on the pre-main sequence. Line profile variability was observed in a range of lines in the primary, and is attributed to inhomogeneous surface distributions of some elements. No magnetic field was detected in any observation of either stars, with an upper limit on the longitudinal magnetic field in both stars of 100 G. Modelling of the phase-resolve longitudinal field measurements leads to a 3 Sigma upper limit on any dipole surface magnetic field of about 400 G.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据