4.7 Article

The destruction and survival of dust in the shell around SN 2008S

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15871.x

关键词

circumstellar matter; Supernovae: individual: SN 2008S

资金

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H008543/1, ST/G002827/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [ST/G002827/1, ST/H008543/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SN 2008S erupted in early 2008 in the grand design spiral galaxy NGC 6946. The progenitor was detected by Prieto et al. in Spitzer Space Telescope images taken over the four years prior to the explosion, but was not detected in deep optical images, from which they inferred a self-obscured object with a mass of about 10 M-circle dot. We obtained Spitzer observations of SN 2008S 5 days after its discovery, as well as coordinated Gemini and Spitzer optical and infrared observations 6 months after its outburst. We have constructed radiative transfer dust models for the object before and after the outburst, using the same r-2 density distribution of pre-existing amorphous carbon grains for all epochs and taking light travel time effects into account. We rule out silicate grains as a significant component of the dust around SN 2008S. The inner radius of the dust shell moved outwards from its pre-outburst value of 85 au to a post-outburst value of 1250 au, attributable to grain vaporization by the light flash from SN 2008S. Although this caused the circumstellar extinction to decrease from A(V) = 15 before the outburst to 0.8 after the outburst, we estimate that less than 2 per cent of the overall circumstellar dust mass was destroyed. The total mass-loss rate from the progenitor star is estimated to have been 0.5-1.0 x 10-4 M-circle dot yr-1. The derived dust-mass-loss rate of 5 x 10-7 M-circle dot yr-1 implies a total dust injection into the interstellar medium of up to 0.01 M-circle dot over the suggested duration of the self-obscured phase. We consider the potential contribution of objects like SN 2008S to the dust enrichment of galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据