4.7 Article

Very Small Array observations of the anomalous microwave emission in the Perseus region

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16023.x

关键词

radiation mechanisms: general; ISM: clouds; dust; extinction; ISM: individual: G159; 6-18; 5; radio continuum: ISM

资金

  1. STFC studentship
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [AYA2007-68058-C03-01]
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F010885/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. STFC [ST/F010885/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dust complex G159.6-18.5 in the Perseus region has previously been observed with the COSMOSOMAS experiment on angular scales of approximate to 1 degrees, and was found to exhibit anomalous microwave emission. We present the first high angular resolution observations of this dust complex, performed with the Very Small Array (VSA) at 33 GHz, to help increase the understanding of the nature of this anomalous emission. On the angular scales observed with the VSA (approximate to 10-40 arcmin), G159.6-18.5 consists of five distinct components, all of which are found to exhibit an excess of emission at 33 GHz that is highly correlated with far-infrared emission. Within the region, we find a range of physical conditions: one of the features, which is associated with the reflection nebula IC 348, has a dust emissivity comparable to that of H ii regions, while the other four features have values in agreement with previous observations of intermediate Galactic latitudes. We provide evidence that all of these compact components have anomalous emission that is consistent with electric dipole emission from very small, rapidly rotating dust grains. We find that these five components contribute approximate to 10 per cent to the flux density of the diffuse extended emission detected by COSMOSOMAS, implying that the bulk of the anomalous emission in Perseus is diffuse and not concentrated in these compact components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据