4.7 Article

A SINFONI integral field spectroscopy survey for galaxy counterparts to damped Lyman α systems - II. Dynamical properties of the galaxies towards Q0302-223 and Q1009-0026

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17597.x

关键词

galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; quasars: absorption lines; quasars: individual: Q0302-223; quasars: individual: Q1009-0026

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [AST-0607739, AST-0908890]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-08-BLAN-0316-01]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-08-BLAN-0316] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908890] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Details of the processes through which galaxies convert their gas into stars need to be studied in order to obtain a complete picture of galaxy formation. One way to tackle these phenomena is to relate the HI gas and the stars in galaxies. Here, we present dynamical properties of damped and subdamped Lyman alpha (DLA) systems identified in H alpha emission with VLT/SINFONI at near-infrared wavelengths. While the DLA towards Q0302 - 223 is found to be dispersion-dominated, the sub-DLA towards Q1009 - 0026 shows clear signatures of rotation. We use a proxy to circular velocity to estimate the mass of the halo in which the sub-DLA resides and find M-halo = 10(12.6) M-circle dot. We also derive dynamical masses of these objects, and find M-dyn = 10(10.3) and 10(10.9) M-circle dot. For one of the two systems (towards Q0302 - 223), we are able to derive a stellar mass of M-* = 10(9.5) M-circle dot from a spectral energy distribution fit. The gas fraction in this object is one-third, comparable to similar objects at these redshifts. Our work illustrates that detailed studies of quasar absorbers can offer entirely new insights into our knowledge of the interaction between stars and the interstellar gas in galaxies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据