4.7 Review

Galaxy assembly bias on the red sequence

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16020.x

关键词

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: statistics; galaxies: stellar content; large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. NASA
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. U.S. Department of Energy
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  8. Max Planck Society
  9. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0806732] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using samples drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we study the relationship between local galaxy density and the properties of galaxies on the red sequence. After removing the mean dependence of average overdensity (or 'environment') on colour and luminosity, we find that there remains a strong residual trend between luminosity-weighted mean stellar age and environment, such that galaxies with older stellar populations favour regions of higher overdensity relative to galaxies of like colour and luminosity (and hence of like stellar mass). Even when excluding galaxies with recent star formation activity (i.e. younger mean stellar ages) from the sample, we still find a highly significant correlation between stellar age and environment at fixed stellar mass. This residual age-density relation provides direct evidence for an assembly bias on the red sequence such that galaxies in higher density regions formed earlier than galaxies of similar mass in lower density environments. We discuss these results in the context of the age-metallicity degeneracy and in comparison to previous studies at low and intermediate redshift. Finally, we consider the potential role of assembly bias in explaining recent results regarding the evolution of post-starburst (or post-quenching) galaxies and the environmental dependence of the Type Ia supernova rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据