4.7 Article

The spectrum of γ-ray burst: a clue

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16134.x

关键词

hydrodynamics; radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; gamma rays: bursts

资金

  1. Danish National Science Foundation
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB824800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we numerically calculate the thermal radiation efficiency of the baryonic outflow. The possible outflow acceleration in the transparent stage, which lowers thermal radiation efficiency, has been taken into account. In the standard internal shock model for the prompt emission, the fast shells should move with a typical Lorentz factor similar to 5 Gamma(i) otherwise the gamma-ray burst (GRB) efficiency will be in disagreement with the observations, where Gamma(i) is the bulk Lorentz factor of the shocked/emitting region. The photosphere radius of these fast shells is small and the thermal radiation is too strong to be effectively outshone by the internal shock emission. This is particularly the case for some extremely bright events having Gamma(i) similar to 103, like GRBs 080319B and 080916C. The absence of a distinct thermal component in the spectrum of most GRBs challenges the standard internal shock model and may suggest a non-baryonic (magnetic) outflow component. Though the magnetic outflow model seems favoured by more and more data, it can hardly reproduce the typical GRB spectrum. In the photosphere-gradual magnetic dissipation scenario, the spectrum cuts off at similar to 1 GeV, too low to account for the observations of GRBs 080916C. In the sudden magnetic energy dissipation model, the low-energy spectrum is expected to be F(nu) proportional to nu-1/2, too soft to be consistent with the data F(nu) proportional to nu 0. We speculate that the low-energy spectrum puzzle could be unveiled by the mechanism that particles, in the magnetic dissipation process, are repeatedly accelerated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据