4.7 Article

Black hole mergers: the first light

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15802.x

关键词

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; hydrodynamics

资金

  1. NSF [AST-0807471]
  2. NASA's Origins of Solar Systems program [NNX09AB90G]
  3. NASA's Astrophysics Theory program [NNX07AH08G]
  4. STFC [PP/E00119X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E00119X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0807471] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coalescence of supermassive black hole binaries occurs via the emission of gravitational waves, that can impart a substantial recoil to the merged black hole. We consider the energy dissipation that results if the recoiling black hole is surrounded by a thin circumbinary disc. Our results differ significantly from those of previous investigations. We show analytically that the dominant source of energy is often potential energy, released as gas in the outer disc attempts to circularize at smaller radii. Thus, dimensional estimates, that include only the kinetic energy gained by the disc gas, underestimate the real energy loss. This underestimate can exceed an order of magnitude, if the recoil is directed close to the disc plane. We use three dimensional smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations and two-dimensional finite difference simulations to verify our analytic estimates. We also compute the bolometric light curve, which is found to vary strongly depending upon the kick angle. A prompt emission signature due to this mechanism may be observable for low-mass (10(6) M-circle dot) black holes whose recoil velocities exceed similar to 10(3) km s(-1). Emission at earlier times can mainly result from the response of the disc to the loss of mass, as the black holes merge. We derive analytically the condition for this to happen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据