4.7 Article

Pressure support versus thermal broadening in the Lyman α forest - II. Effects of the equation of state on transverse structure

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16384.x

关键词

methods: numerical; intergalactic medium; cosmology: miscellaneous

资金

  1. NSF [AST-0707985]
  2. NASA ADP [NNX08AJ44G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examine the impact of gas pressure on the transverse coherence of high-redshift (2 < z < 4) Lyman alpha (Ly alpha) forest absorption along neighbouring lines of sight that probe the gas Jeans scale (projected separation delta r(p) < 500 h-1 kpc comoving, angular separation delta theta less than or similar to 30 arcsec). We compare predictions from two smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations that have different photoionization heating rates and thus different temperature-density relations in the intergalactic medium (IGM). We also compare spectra computed from the gas distributions to those computed from the pressureless dark matter. The coherence along neighbouring sightlines is markedly higher for the hotter, higher pressure simulation and lower for the dark matter spectra. We quantify this coherence using the flux cross-correlation function and the conditional distribution of flux decrements as a function of transverse and line-of-sight (velocity) separation. Sightlines separated by delta theta less than or similar to 15 arcsec are ideal for probing this transverse coherence. Higher pressure decreases the redshift-space anisotropy of the flux correlation function, while higher thermal broadening increases the anisotropy. In contrast to the longitudinal (line-of-sight) structure of the Ly alpha forest, the transverse structure on these scales is dominated by pressure effects rather than thermal broadening. With the rapid recent growth in the number of known close quasar pairs, paired line-of-sight observations offer a promising new route to probe the IGM temperature-density relation and test the unexpectedly high temperatures that have been inferred from single sightline analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据