4.7 Review

Keeping the Universe ionized: photoheating and the clumping factor of the high-redshift intergalactic medium

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14486.x

关键词

hydrodynamics; radiative transfer; methods: numerical; galaxies: formation; intergalactic medium; cosmology: theory

资金

  1. Marie Curie Excellence [MEXT-CT-2004-014112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The critical star formation rate (SFR) density required to keep the intergalactic hydrogen ionized depends crucially oil the average rate of recombinations in the intergalactic medium (IGM). This rate is proportional to the clumping factor C equivalent to IGM/(2), where rho(b) and (rho(b)) are the local and cosmic mean baryon density, respectively, and the brackets <>(IGM) indicate spatial averaging over the recombining gas in the IGM. We perform a Suite of cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamic Simulations that include radiative cooling to calculate the volume-weighted Clumping factor of the IGM at redshifts z >= 6. We focus oil the effect of photoionization heating by a uniform ultraviolet background and find that photoheating strongly reduces the clumping factor because the increased pressure support smoothes out small-scale density fluctuations. Photoionization heating is often said to provide a negative feedback on the re-ionization of the IGM because it suppresses the cosmic SFR by boiling the gas out of low-mass haloes. However, because of the reduction of the clumping factor it also makes it easier to keep the IGM ionized. Photoheating therefore also provides a positive feedback which, while known to exist, has received Much less attention. We demonstrate that this positive feedback is in fact very strong. Using conservative assumptions, we find that if the IGM was reheated at z greater than or similar to 9, the observed population of star-forming galaxies at z approximate to 6 may be sufficient to keep the IGM ionized, provided that the fraction of ionizing photons that escape the star-forming regions to ionize the IGM is larger than similar to 0.2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据