4.7 Review

The XMM Cluster Survey: forecasting cosmological and cluster scaling-relation parameter constraints

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14923.x

关键词

methods: statistical; galaxies: clusters: general; cosmological parameters; cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

资金

  1. Swedish Galo Foundation
  2. Gunvor & Josef Aner Foundation
  3. C. E. Levin Foundation
  4. Sir Richard Stapley Educational Trust
  5. POCTI [POCI2010, CTE-AST/58888/2004]
  6. PPARC/STFC
  7. RAS Hosie Bequest
  8. XMM
  9. NASA-LTSA [NAG-11634]
  10. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [W-7405-Eng-48]
  11. HEFCE
  12. STFC
  13. STFC [PP/E001149/1, ST/F002858/1, ST/G001979/1, ST/F006977/1, ST/H001581/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G001979/1, ST/H001581/1, ST/F002858/1, ST/F006977/1, PP/E001149/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We forecast the constraints on the values of Sigma(8), (m) and cluster scaling-relation parameters which we expect to obtain from the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS). We assume a flat Lambda cold dark matter Universe and perform a Monte Carlo Markov Chain analysis of the evolution of the number density of galaxy clusters that takes into account a detailed simulated selection function. Comparing our current observed number of clusters shows good agreement with predictions. We determine the expected degradation of the constraints as a result of self-calibrating the luminosity-temperature relation (with scatter), including temperature measurement errors, and relying on photometric methods for the estimation of galaxy cluster redshifts. We examine the effects of systematic errors in scaling relation and measurement error assumptions. Using only (T, z) self-calibration, we expect to measure (m) to +/- 0.03 (and (Lambda) to the same accuracy assuming flatness), and Sigma(8) to +/- 0.05, also constraining the normalization and slope of the luminosity-temperature relation to +/- 6 and +/- 13 per cent (at 1 Sigma), respectively, in the process. Self-calibration fails to jointly constrain the scatter and redshift evolution of the luminosity-temperature relation significantly. Additional archival and/or follow-up data will improve on this. We do not expect measurement errors or imperfect knowledge of their distribution to degrade constraints significantly. Scaling-relation systematics can easily lead to cosmological constraints 2 Sigma or more away from the fiducial model. Our treatment is the first exact treatment to this level of detail, and introduces a new 'smoothed ML' (Maximum Likelihood) estimate of expected constraints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据