4.7 Article

The non-peculiar velocity dispersion profile of the stellar system ω Centauri

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14864.x

关键词

techniques: radial velocities; stars: kinematics; stars: Population II; globular clusters : individual: omega Centauri

资金

  1. INAF [CRA 1.06.10.04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results of a survey of radial velocities over a wide region extending from r similar or equal to 10 out to 80 arcmin (similar to 1.5 tidal radii) within the massive star cluster omega Centauri (omega Cen). The survey was performed with FLAMES@VLT, to study the velocity dispersion profile in the outer regions of this stellar system. We derived accurate radial velocities for a sample of 2557 newly observed stars, identifying 318 bona fide cluster red giants. Merging our data with those provided by our previous survey, we assembled a final homogeneous sample of 946 cluster members that allowed us to trace the velocity dispersion profile from the centre out to r similar to 32 arcmin. The velocity dispersion appears to decrease monotonically over this range, from a central value of sigma(v) similar to 17.2 km s(-1) down to a minimum value of sigma(v) similar to 5.2 km s(-1). The observed surface brightness profile, rotation curve, velocity dispersion profile and ellipticity profile are simultaneously well reproduced by a simple dynamical model in which mass follows light, within the classical Newtonian theory of gravitation. The comparison with an N-body model of the evolution of a system mimicking. Cen during the last 10 orbits into the Galactic potential suggests that (i) the rotation of stars lying in the inner similar or equal to 20 arcmin of the clusters is not due to the effects of the tidal field of the Milky Way, as hypothesized by other authors and (ii) the overall observational scenario is still compatible with the possibility that the outer regions of the cluster are subject to some tidal stirring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据