4.7 Article

The role of minor mergers in the recent star formation history of early-type galaxies

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14403.x

关键词

methods: N-body simulations; galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation

资金

  1. Leverhulme Early-Career Fellowship
  2. Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851
  3. BIPAC Institute
  4. Senior Research Fellowship from Worcester College, Oxford
  5. ANR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate that the large scatter in the ultraviolet (UV) colours of intermediate-mass early-type galaxies in the local Universe and the inferred low-level recent star formation (RSF) in these objects can be reproduced by minor mergers in the standard Lambda cold dark matter (Lambda CDM) cosmology. Numerical simulations of mergers with mass ratios <= 1:4, with reasonable assumptions for the ages, metallicities and dust properties of the merger progenitors, produce good agreement with the observed UV colours of the early-type population , if the infalling satellites are assumed to have (cold) gas fractions >= 20 per cent. Early-types that satisfy (NUV - r) less than or similar to 3.8 are likely to have experienced mergers with mass ratios between 1:4 and 1:6 within the last similar to 1.5 Gyr, while those that satisfy 3.8 < (NUV - r) < 5.5 are consistent with either recent mergers with mass ratios <= 1:6 or mergers with higher mass ratios that occurred more than similar to 1.5 Gyr in the past. We demonstrate that the early-type colour-magnitude relations and colour distributions, in both the UV and optical spectral ranges, are consistent with the expected frequency of minor merging activity in the standard Lambda CDM cosmology at low redshift. We present a strong plausibility argument for minor mergers to be the principal mechanism behind the large UV scatter and associated low-level RSF observed in early-type galaxies in the nearby Universe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据