4.7 Article

The nearly universal merger rate of dark matter haloes in ΛCDM cosmology

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13075.x

关键词

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; cosmology : theory; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We construct merger trees from the largest data base of dark matter haloes to date provided by the Millennium Simulation to quantify the merger rates of haloes over a broad range of descendant halo mass (10(12) less than or similar to M-0 less than or similar to 10(15)M(circle dot)), progenitor mass ratio (10(-3) less than or similar to xi <= 1), and redshift (0 <= z less than or similar to 6). We find the mean merger rate per halo, B/n, to have very simple dependence on M0,., and z, and propose a universal fitting form for B/n that is accurate to 10 - 20 per cent. Overall, B/n depends very weakly on the halo mass (proportional to M-0(0.08)) and scales as a power law in the progenitor mass ratio (proportional to xi(-2)) for minor mergers (xi less than or similar to 0.1) with a mild upturn for major mergers. As a function of time, we find the merger rate per Gyr to evolve roughly as ( 1 + z)(n)m with n(m)= 2-2.3, while the rate per unit redshift is nearly independent of z. Several tests are performed to assess how our merger rates are affected by e.g. the time interval between Millennium outputs, binary versus multiple progenitor mergers, and mass conservation and diffuse accretion during mergers. In particular, we find halo fragmentations to be a general issue in merger tree construction from N-body simulations and compare two methods for handling these events. We compare our results with predictions of two analytical models for halo mergers based on the extended Press-Schechter (EPS) model and the coagulation theory. We find that the EPS model overpredicts the major merger rates and underpredicts the minor merger rates by up to a factor of a few.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据