4.7 Article

Peculiar velocities into the next generation: cosmological parameters from large surveys without bias from non-linear structure

期刊

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13637.x

关键词

surveys; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; cosmological parameters; galaxies : statistics; large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. Leverhulme Trust
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/F001118/1, ST/G504284/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. STFC [ST/G504284/1, ST/F001991/1, PP/F001118/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate methods to best estimate the normalization of the mass density fluctuation power spectrum (sigma(8)) using peculiar velocity data from a survey like the six-degree Field Galaxy Velocity Survey (6dFGSv). We focus on two potential problems: (i) biases from non-linear growth of structure and (ii) the large number of velocities in the survey. Simulations of Lambda CDM-like models are used to test the methods. We calculate the likelihood from a full covariance matrix of velocities averaged in grid cells. This simultaneously reduces the number of data points and smoothes out non-linearities which tend to dominate on small scales. We show how the averaging can be taken into account in the predictions in a practical way, and show the effect of the choice of cell size. We find that a cell size can be chosen that significantly reduces the non-linearities without significantly increasing the error bars on cosmological parameters. We compare our results with those from a principal components analysis following Watkins et al. and Feldman et al. to select a set of optimal moments constructed from linear combinations of the peculiar velocities that are least sensitive to the non-linear scales. We conclude that averaging in grid cells performs equally well. We find that for a survey such as 6dFGSv we can estimate sigma(8) with less than 3 per cent bias from non-linearities. The expected error on sigma(8) after marginalizing over Omega(m) is approximately 16 per cent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据