4.7 Article

The chemical compositions of 10 new sub-DLAs and strong Lyman-limit systems at z ≲ 1.5

期刊

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12819.x

关键词

ISM : abundances; quasars : absorption lines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present chemical abundance measurements from medium-resolution observations of eight subdamped Ly alpha (sub-DLA) absorber and two strong Lyman-limit systems at z less than or similar to 1.5 observed with the Magellan Inamori Kyocera Echelle (MIKE) spectrograph on the 6.5-m Magellan II Clay telescope. These observations were taken as part of an ongoing project to determine abundances in z(abs) less than or similar to 1.5 quasar absorption line systems focusing on sub-DLA systems. These observations increase the sample of Zn measurements in z(abs) less than or similar to 1.5 sub-DLAs by similar to 50 per cent. Lines of Mg I, Mg II, Al II, Al III, Ca II, Mn II, Fe II and Zn II were detected and column densities were determined. Zn II, a relatively undepleted element and tracer of the gas-phasemetallicity is detected in two of these systems, with [Zn/H] = -0.05 +/- 0.12 and [Zn/H] > +0.86. The latter one is however a weak system with N-HI < 18.8, and therefore may need significant ionization corrections to the abundances. Fe II lines were detected in all systems, with an average Fe abundance of <[Fe/H]> = - 0.68, higher than typical Fe abundances for DLA systems at these redshifts. This high mean [Fe/H] could be due to less depletion of Fe on to dust grains, or to higher abundances in these systems. We also discuss the relative abundances in these absorbers. The systems with high metallicity show high ratios of [Mn/Fe] and [Zn/Fe], as seen previously in another sub-DLA. These higher values of [Mn/Fe] could be a result of heavy depletion of Fe on to grains, unmixed gas, or an intrinsically non-solar abundance pattern. Based on CLOUDY modelling, we do not expect ionization effects to cause this phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据