4.5 Article

Phosphorylation dependent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of BES1 is a key regulatory event in brassinosteroid signaling

期刊

MOLECULES AND CELLS
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 283-290

出版社

KOREAN SOC MOLECULAR & CELLULAR BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1007/s10059-010-0035-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Plant Diversity Research Center of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Korean government [PF06305-00]
  2. Plant Signaling Network Research Center, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology/Korea Science and Engineering Foundation [2009-0079303/R0602484]
  3. BioGreen 21 program [20080401-034-041-008-01-00]
  4. Korean Research Foundation [KRF-2008-314-C00351]
  5. Brain Korea 21 fellowships
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-314-C00351] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brassinosteroids BRs)play important roles in plant growth and development.BRs modulate the phosphorylation status of two crucial transcription factors, BRI1 EMS SUPPRESSOR1 BES1)and BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT1 (BZR1).Here we show that BES1 functions as a nucleocytoplasmic signal transmitter, and that its subcellular localization modulates the output intensity of the BR signal.BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE2 (BIN2)and other group II GLYCOGEN SYNTHASE KINASE 3 GSK3)-like kinases phosphorylate BES1 and induce its nuclear export by regulating its binding affinity with 14-3-3 proteins.We identified twelve putative phosphorylation residues in BES1.Two of these residues, Ser 171 and Thr 175, are critical for interaction with 14-3-3 proteins.The other putative phosphorylation sites in the N-terminal region are required for the BIN2-mediated nuclear export of BES1.Mutations of these motifs result in increased nuclear accumulation of BES1 and enhanced BR responses in transgenic plants.Taken together, our results indicate that the spatial redistribution of BES1 is important for regulation of the BR signaling output.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据