4.6 Article

Optimization of Fermentation Conditions for the Production of the M23 Protease Pseudoalterin by Deep-Sea Pseudoalteromonas sp CF6-2 with Artery Powder as an Inducer

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 4779-4790

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules19044779

关键词

pseudoalterin; fermentation; response surfaces methodology; M23 proteases; deep-sea bacterium

资金

  1. Hi-Tech Research and Development program of China [2014AA093509, 2011AA090703, 2012AA092103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271896, 41176130]
  3. COMRA Program [DY125-15-T-05, DY125-13-E-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteases in the M23 family have specific activities toward elastin and bacterial peptidoglycan. The peptidoglycan-degrading property makes these proteases have potential as novel antimicrobials. Because M23 proteases cannot be maturely expressed in Escherichia coli, it is significant to improve the production of these enzymes in their wild strains. Pseudoalterin is a new M23 protease secreted by the deep-sea bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. CF6-2. In this study, the fermentation conditions of strain CF6-2 for pseudoalterin production were optimized using single factor experiments and response surface methodology to improve the enzyme yield. To reduce the fermentation cost, bovine artery powder instead of elastin was determined as a cheap and efficient inducer. Based on single factor experiments, artery powder content, culture temperature and culture time were determined as the main factors influencing pseudoalterin production and were further optimized by the central composite design. The optimal values of these factors were determined as: artery powder of 1.2%, culture temperature of 20.17 degrees C and culture time of 28.04 h. Under the optimized conditions, pseudoalterin production reached 100.02 +/- 9.0 U/mL, more than twice of that before optimization. These results lay a good foundation for developing the biotechnological potential of pseudoalterin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据