4.6 Article

Prebiotic Potential of Agave angustifolia Haw Fructans with Different Degrees of Polymerization

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 12660-12675

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules190812660

关键词

Bifidobacterium; Lactobacillus; Agave angustifolia Haw; prebiotic; fructans

资金

  1. Instituto Politecnico Nacional [SIP-INNOVA 1167, SIP 20131814]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), Mexico
  3. Centro de Investigacion y Asistencia en Tecnologia y Diseno del estado de Jalisco (CIATEJ), Mexico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inulin-type fructans are the most studied prebiotic compounds because of their broad range of health benefits. In particular, plants of the Agave genus are rich in fructans. Agave-derived fructans have a branched structure with both beta-(2 -> 1) and beta-(2 -> 6) linked fructosyl chains attached to the sucrose start unit with a degree of polymerization (DP) of up to 80 fructose units. The objective of this work was to assess the prebiotic potential of three Agave angustifolia Haw fructan fractions (AFF) with different degrees of polymerization. The three fructan fractions were extracted from the agave stem by lixiviation and then purified by ultrafiltration and ion exchange chromatography: AFF1, AFF2 and AFF3 with high (3-60 fructose units), medium (2-40) and low (2-22) DP, respectively. The fructan profile was determined with high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD), which confirmed a branched fructan structure. Structural elucidation was performed by Fourier Transform Infra-Red Spectroscopy. The AFF spectrum shows characteristic fructan bands. The prebiotic effect of these fractions was assessed in vitro through fermentation by Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus strains. Four growth patterns were observed. Some bacteria did not grow with any of the AFF, while other strains grew with only AFF3. Some bacteria grew according to the molecular weight of the AFF and some grew indistinctly with the three fructan fractions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据