4.6 Article

Effects of Selected Dietary Secondary Metabolites on Reactive Oxygen Species Production Caused by Iron(II) Autoxidation

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 20023-20033

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules191220023

关键词

iron(II) autoxidation; dietary antioxidants; polyphenols; superoxide; hydroxyl radical; free radicals; oxidative stress; aging; inflammation; chronic diseases

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24630-B21]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 24630] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P24630] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron is an essential co-factor for many enzymes that catalyze electron transfer reactions. It is well known that so-called poorly liganded iron can increase ROS concentrations and trigger oxidative stress that is capable of initiating apoptosis. Conversely, controlled ROS production has been recognized as an integral part of cellular signaling. Elevated ROS concentrations are associated with aging, inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Anti-aging properties have been attributed especially to antioxidant phenolic plant metabolites that represent food additives in our diet. Consequently, this study explores the effects of flavonoids (quercetin and rutin), several phenolic acids (caffeic, chlorogenic, and protocatechuic acid), and the alkaloid caffeine on iron(II) autoxidation and ROS production in comparison to the standard antioxidants ascorbic acid and Trolox. The iron(II) autoxidation assay was carried out in pH 6.0 (plant apoplast and inflamed human tissue) and 7.4 (cell cytoplasm and human blood plasma). The obtained results accentuate phenolic acids as the more specific antioxidants compared to ascorbic acid and Trolox. Flavonoid redox chemistry depends more on the chemical milieu, specifically on pH. In vivo, the presence of iron cannot be ruled out and wrongly or poorly complexed iron has been pointed out as causative agent of various age-related diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据