4.6 Article

The Passiflora tripartita (Banana Passion) Fruit: A Source of Bioactive Flavonoid C-Glycosides Isolated by HSCCC and Characterized by HPLC-DAD-ESI/MS/MS

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 1672-1692

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules18021672

关键词

banana passion fruits; Passiflora tripartita; Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima; tumbo; HPLC-MS; C-glycosyl flavonoids; phenolic compounds; antioxidants; High-Speed Countercurrent Chromatography; HSCCC

资金

  1. FONDECYT [1110068]
  2. CODEI (University of Antofagasta) [5383]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The banana passion fruit (Passiflora tripartita Breiter, Passifloraceae) known as tumbo is very appreciated in tropical and subtropical countries of South America. Methanolic extracts from peel and the fruit juice of P. tripartita growing in Chile were analyzed for antioxidant capacity as well as for flavonoid and phenolic content. A chromatographic method was developed for the rapid identification of the main phenolics in the samples by HPLC-DAD and HPLC-MS. The fast fingerprint analysis allowed the detection of eighteen flavonoid C-glycosides and four flavonoid O-glycoside derivatives which were characterized by UV spectra and ESI-MS-MS analysis. Several of the C-glycosides detected are structurally related to the orientin derivative 4'-methoxy-luteolin-8-C-(6 '' acetyl)-beta-D-glucopyranoside (31), fully elucidated by spectroscopic methods. The antioxidant derivative 31 along with schaftoside, vicenin II, orientin and vitexin were isolated from the fruit extract by high-speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC). A suitable method for the preparative isolation of flavonol C-glycosides from tumbo extracts by HSCCC is reported. The pulp of the fruits showed good antioxidant capacity (12.89 +/- 0.02 mu g/mL in the DPPH assay). The peel presented the highest content of flavonoids (56.03 +/- 4.34 mg quercetin/100 g dry weight) which is related to the highest antioxidant power (10.41 +/- 0.01 mu g/mL in the DPPH assay).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据