4.3 Article

Evidence for an excitatory GABAA response in human motor cortex in idiopathic generalised epilepsy

期刊

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 36-42

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.01.014

关键词

Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Epilepsy; Cortical excitability; GABA; Disinhibition

资金

  1. Neuromuscular Foundation of Western Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Impaired GABAergic inhibition has been implicated in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. The possibility of a paradoxical excitatory effect of GABA in epilepsy has been suggested, but has not been investigated in vivo. We investigated pre- and post-synaptic GABAergic mechanisms in patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE). Method: In 10 patients and 12 control subjects we explored short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI, LICI; post-synaptic GABA(A) and GABA(B)-mediated respectively) and long-interval intracortical facilitation (LICF; pre-synaptic disinhibition) using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Results: While post-synaptic GABAB-mediated inhibition was unchanged in IGE (p = 0.09), LICF was reduced compared to controls (controls: 141 +/- 17% of baseline; untreated patients: 107 +/- 12%, p = 0.2; treated patients: 79 +/- 10%, p = 0.003). GABA(A)-mediated inhibition was reduced in untreated patients (response amplitude 56 +/- 4% of baseline vs. 26 +/- 6% in controls, p = 0.004) and normalised with treatment (37 +/- 12%, p = 0.5 vs. controls). When measured during Lid, GABAA-mediated inhibition became excitatory in untreated IGE (response amplitude 120 10% of baseline, p = 0.017), but not in treated patients. Conclusion: Pre- and post-synaptic GABA-mediated inhibitory mechanisms are altered in IGE. The findings lend in vivo support to evidence from experimental models and in vitro studies of human epileptic brain tissue that GABA may have a paradoxical excitatory role in ictogenesis. (C) 2015 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据