4.3 Article

The outcomes of pregnancy in women with untreated epilepsy

期刊

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 77-81

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2014.08.008

关键词

Antiepileptic drugs; Epilepsy; Foetal malformations; Pregnancy; Seizures

资金

  1. Epilepsy Society of Australia
  2. Victorian Epilepsy Foundation
  3. Epilepsy Australia
  4. Sanofi-Aventis
  5. UCB Pharma
  6. Janssen-Cilag
  7. Novartis
  8. Sci-Gen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine the outcomes in regards to seizure control and foetal malformation in pregnant women with epilepsy not treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Method: Analysis of data from the Australian Register of AEDs in Pregnancy on 148 women with epilepsy who were not receiving AEDs before and during at least the first trimester of pregnancy. Results: Seizure control was less likely to be maintained in AED-untreated pregnancies. Whether AED therapy had been ceased in preparation for pregnancy, or had not been employed for long periods before pregnancy, made no statistically significant difference to seizure control outcomes, but those who ceased therapy in preparation for pregnancy were more likely to again be taking AED therapy by term. Foetal malformation rates were reasonably similar in untreated pregnancies, and in treated pregnancies if pregnancies exposed to known AED teratogens (valproate and probably topiramate) were excluded from consideration. Conclusion: Leaving epilepsy untreated during pregnancy appears disadvantageous from the standpoint of seizure control: it also does not reduce the hazard of foetal malformation unless it avoids valproate or topiramate intake during pregnancy. (C) 2014 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据