4.6 Review

Hypervalent Nonbonded Interactions of a Divalent Sulfur Atom. Implications in Protein Architecture and the Functions

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 7266-7283

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules17067266

关键词

Protein Data Bank; chalcogen bonds; sigma-hole bonds; molecular assembly; protein engineering; drug design

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [15014211, 16014223, 16350092]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16014223, 23550198, 16350092, 15014211] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In organic molecules a divalent sulfur atom sometimes adopts weak coordination to a proximate heteroatom (X). Such hypervalent nonbonded S center dot center dot center dot X interactions can control the molecular structure and chemical reactivity of organic molecules, as well as their assembly and packing in the solid state. In the last decade, similar hypervalent interactions have been demonstrated by statistical database analysis to be present in protein structures. In this review, weak interactions between a divalent sulfur atom and an oxygen or nitrogen atom in proteins are highlighted with several examples. S center dot center dot center dot O interactions in proteins showed obviously different structural features from those in organic molecules (i.e., pi(O) -> sigma(S)* versus n(O) -> sigma(S)* directionality). The difference was ascribed to the HOMO of the amide group, which expands in the vertical direction (pO) rather than in the plane (nO). S center dot center dot center dot X interactions in four model proteins, phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)), ribonuclease A (RNase A), insulin, and lysozyme, have also been analyzed. The results suggested that S center dot center dot center dot X interactions would be important factors that control not only the three-dimensional structure of proteins but also their functions to some extent. Thus, S center dot center dot center dot X interactions will be useful tools for protein engineering and the ligand design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据