4.7 Article

Serial Transplantation and Long-term Engraftment of Intra-arterially Delivered Clonally Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Injured Bone Marrow

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 160-168

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2013.221

关键词

-

资金

  1. L. David and E. Virginia Baldwin Foundation
  2. NIH/NIAMS [R01AR049785]
  3. NIH [T32 GM007250]
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000439] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR049785] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007250] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been hypothesized that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) home to sites of injury. Nevertheless, efficient delivery of MSCs to target organs and description of their ultimate fate remain major challenges. We provide evidence that intra-arterially (IA) injected MSCs selectively engraft from the circulation as perivascular cells in the bone marrow (BM) after a localized radiation injury. Luciferase-expressing MSCs, derived from a conditionally immortalized clone (BMC-9) representing a pure population of cells, were arterially delivered into mice irradiated in one leg. Cell distribution was measured by bioluminescent imaging and final destination assessed by luciferase immunolocalization. IA injections resulted in engraftment only in the irradiated leg where cells localize and proliferate abluminal to the BM vasculature, a phenomenon not replicated with intravenous injections or with IA injections of kidney cells harvested from the same donor used for MSCs. Furthermore, MSCs harvested from the engrafted marrow and serially transplanted retain the ability to selectively engraft at sites of injury. This study demonstrates that MSCs can serially engraft at sites of injury from the circulation, that they reside in the perivascular space, and that arterial delivery is more efficient than venous delivery for cell engraftment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据