4.7 Article

Effective Dystrophin Restoration by a Novel Muscle-Homing Peptide-Morpholino Conjugate in Dystrophin-Deficient mdx Mice

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1333-1341

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2014.63

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese National Basic Research Program (973) [2012CBA01305, 2012CB932503]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81301526, 81101340, 81273420]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20111202110002]
  4. Science Foundation of Tianjin Medical University [2011KY39]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antisense oligonucleotide (AO)-mediated splice correction therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy has shown huge promise from recent phase 2b clinical trials, however high doses and costs are required and targeted delivery can lower both of these. We have previously demonstrated the feasibility of targeted delivery of AOs by conjugating a chimeric peptide, consisting of a muscle-specific peptide and a cell-penetrating peptide, to AOs in mdx mice. Although increased uptake in muscle was observed, the majority of peptide-AO conjugate was found in the liver. To search for more effective muscle-homing peptides, we carried out in vitro biopanning in myoblasts and identified a novel 12-mer peptide (M12) showing preferential binding to skeletal muscle compared to the liver. When conjugated to phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers, similar to 25% of normal level of dystrophin expression was achieved in body-wide skeletal muscles in mdx mice with significant recovery in grip strength, whereas <2% in corresponding tissues treated with either muscle-specific peptide-phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer or unmodified phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer under identical conditions. Our data provide evidences for the first time that a muscle-homing peptide alone can enhance AO delivery to muscle without appreciable toxicity at 75 mg/kg, suggesting M12-phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer can be an alternative option to current AOs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据